Last Week of Autumn Semester
It is the
last week of the semester and I can proudly say, with two hundred TWD in my
wallet, that I have survived my credit card expiring. In other news, we were
asked this week to submit feedback on the ICLP program. As I have voiced many
of my complaints before to all of my teachers, I have no illusions that my
responses can truly be considered anonymous, so I feel no compunction in
sharing them here (yes, I realise the contradiction of nevertheless Americanising
my spelling, which I do as a general rule to keep my responses as anonymous as
possible):
In
comparison with other language courses and programs I have taken in past years,
ICLP's pedagogy has been the most disappointingly outdated. If teachers succeed
at imparting language skills on their students, it is not thanks to the
program's general approach to learning but in spite of it. My frustrations
begin with the teaching materials, a large portion of the TOCC textbook having
been written, apparently, during the lifetime of Chairman Mao. One way to help
students engage with the material would be to substitute Mao for Xi Jinping and
Zhou Enlai for Li Keqiang. But even an outdated, insultingly simplistic (and,
in some places, thoroughly propagandistic) textbook can be rescued with the
right pedagogical approach. The class's stress on rote memorization of the
textbook was wholly unnecessary; it prioritized parroting sentences over
understanding the logic behind underlying grammar structures. The material
could be learned much more effectively by having students actively and
creatively deploy these grammar structures, something which we only began to
do, in a limited way, towards the end of the semester. It goes without saying
that numerous studies have proved practical application of learned materials to
yield much greater results than rote memorization. I have not enjoyed a single
class of TOCC outside of presentation days, nor do I think I benefited from
these classes as much as I could have. In closing, I can only add that I have
little faith my criticism will change anything. Whenever I brought comments and
suggestions before my teachers, they dismissed them by insisting that TOCC
simply has to be taught this way. As a student who has taken classes in five
different foreign languages, I highly doubt it. ICLP can and should change. It
is saddening that even classes in mainland China take a more progressive
approach to teaching than this program.
Comments
Post a Comment